Computer Fees in Universities


 

Executive Summary
Read the full report

As the use of information communication technology (ICT) on campuses increases, institutions are striving to provide the best possible ICT systems for their staff and students.   Over the years, the cost of developing and maintaining ICT systems has required institutions to resort to complex and well thought out strategies to ensure that their ICT systems are sustainable.

This report is a compilation of facts and figures on trends with regards to the imposition of ICT fees by various institutions in developed countries.  It is also a collection of information on ICT systems development and use by some of these institutions.

It is very crucial for academic institutions to realize that the development and running of an efficient ICT system requires carefully thought our plans.  It involves a process of determining the amount of fees to charge students, the nature of those fees (e.g. one lump sum for computer use, or one lump sum and then payment for additional services like printing, etc) and the ways these computer fees are used in these institutions.  The goal of this report is to furnish institutions/organizations with some guidelines from which specific and contextually appropriate plans and strategies can be developed.

The 12th National Survey on Computing and Information Technology in US higher education revealed that between 1994 and 2001, the use of email in classroom instruction has increased from less than 10% to about 63%.  Over the same period, the use of Web pages for disseminating course materials rose from 7% to about 35%, while the use of Web simulations increased from about 9% to 18% and the use of ICT in course presentations and handouts rose from about 15% to 45%.  As well, the survey demonstrated that the use of Internet resources for faculty and student research rose from about 11% to 43% between 1995 and 2000.

In 1997, the average ICT fee was $5.96 per credit for public universities. However, according to the Campus Computing Project,  in the year 2001 the average ICT fee paid by students in public and  private universities is $197.  (The University of Iowa, for example, charges $140).  For public and private 4-year colleges, the average fee is $245 and $282 respectively. For community (two-year) colleges, the average ICT fee is $164.

Interestingly, the imposition of computer fees at universities in The United States has been met by little or no opposition from students. This seems to be as a result of the institutions involving students to guide the process of determining and spending these fees. This strategy appears to have given the students an opportunity to fully understand how much it cost their institutions to provide the ICT services. Furthermore students felt that their opinions mattered and that their contributions were considered meaningful.

One issue of increasing importance in institutions of higher learning is access to dial-up facilities.  Eighty-four percent of public universities provide dial-in ISP services for their students.  (Students at the other 16% use local, private sector ISPs.)  Of these, 60% provide it for free.  In the case of private universities, 62% provide dial-in access and 43% of these provide it for free.

Also included in this report is a survey of how computer fees are used in the various institutions, revealing a list of common recommendations for providing ICT services to students:

  1. Provide hardware and software for student computer labs, including in some cases specialized software and laptops

  2. Hire personnel to support students in labs and faculty in classrooms

  3. Upgrade server support in student computer labs

  4. Upgrade infrastructure

  5. Increase online courses

  6. Enhance classrooms with technology

  7. Improve remote connectivity

 


Home UI Linkages Training Technicians  Coaching Decision Makers  Courses  Computer Donations


School of Library and Information SciencePhoto of University of Iowa campus
Black dome and wordmark on 1 line - Small
Copyright 1996-2008   The WiderNet Project

This work was compiled by Saweda Liverpool and Cliff Missen